🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.